Posts: 4
Threads: 3
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 4
Threads: 3
Joined: May 2021
Does anyone have strong thoughts on rendering in LRT vs AE? I personally think LRT works well because of the multi-threading which makes rendering the intermediate sequence faster.
Some of my friends use AE to render directly from the RAW files, claiming better quality, but I don’t think that’s the case because in LRT you could render TIFF (lossless) files directly and then use that intermediate sequence for video rendering. Behind the scenes it’s my understanding AE also creates a lossless bitmap type of image for the video encoder but it’s so much slower than LRT given lack of multi-threading.
Curious to hear from others what the appeal of using AE vs LRT is for rendering final timelapse videos, assuming you’re not applying any other effects. I know in AE you can submit batch…but given how much slower it is are you really benefiting? Thanks.
Some of my friends use AE to render directly from the RAW files, claiming better quality, but I don’t think that’s the case because in LRT you could render TIFF (lossless) files directly and then use that intermediate sequence for video rendering. Behind the scenes it’s my understanding AE also creates a lossless bitmap type of image for the video encoder but it’s so much slower than LRT given lack of multi-threading.
Curious to hear from others what the appeal of using AE vs LRT is for rendering final timelapse videos, assuming you’re not applying any other effects. I know in AE you can submit batch…but given how much slower it is are you really benefiting? Thanks.