Posts: 7
Threads: 1
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 7
Threads: 1
Joined: Aug 2013
Hi Gunter
Your answer here brings me to another question:
Usually the part taking the most amount of time in the whole LRT-LR workflow is the final Lightroom export of the JPG sequence, which will be rendered by LRT in the end. Especially when you're working in the field on a notebook with mediocre CPU and other hardware features, it can take hours to generate the 4K JPG's.
Now I wonder if I couldn't save a lot of computing time, if I could just export such sequences as 1920x1080 JPG's, when I already know from the beginning, that my final sequence will be in 1080p maximum (especially also, when the starting material comes i.e. from a 1080p-camera-made-video)?
Andy
Your answer here brings me to another question:
Usually the part taking the most amount of time in the whole LRT-LR workflow is the final Lightroom export of the JPG sequence, which will be rendered by LRT in the end. Especially when you're working in the field on a notebook with mediocre CPU and other hardware features, it can take hours to generate the 4K JPG's.
Now I wonder if I couldn't save a lot of computing time, if I could just export such sequences as 1920x1080 JPG's, when I already know from the beginning, that my final sequence will be in 1080p maximum (especially also, when the starting material comes i.e. from a 1080p-camera-made-video)?
Andy
