Posts: 7
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2011
Hello.
I am an avid learner of this technique I discovered recently. I tried your software v1.4 beta (when the final?).
Can I list in my opinion, things that I found very good, and some less than modest suggestions:
good:
- The management of keyframes is remarkable and allows an infinite number of interventions
- The possibility of creating virtual movements without the aid of a dolly
- In general. I have not found anything as comprehensive and integrated with LR for metadata management in line with changes on them.
not good (to me ...!!):
- Like all applications in Java, uses an inordinate amount of memory! In situations with more than 1000 shots and you need a hardware performance significantly, especially if you want to keep open Lightroom. The deflickering is sometimes so heavy that the application sends a system with virtually hung 4Gb/1033Mhz ram and a quad core 2.5 Mhz and I have to force quit (kill), without knowing if the tool is working or if you just planted!
- On my imac (the features described above) I found that works almost exclusively on a single processor, perhaps the application is not written to parallelize batch jobs? If so, it would be a great advantage to work in multi-threaded processors.
- You can not always get good results from deflickering (perhaps it is not clear to me from the tutorials ...)
suggestions:
- Introduction of a function to sample the images to a given sequence of recovery. For example, if I took 1 picture every 5 seconds, but I want to use one of my same sequence every 20/30 etc. .. I am without having to select the shots one by one to skip a certain number.
- A progress bar of the business even when you process the deflickering and maybe a warning about the use of thresholds. It is not clear when the effect occurs more or less.
- I have not found a clear description of the use of linear functions (fade in / out / etc. .., about when should one or the other and the results they produce.
Sorry if I'm allowed, but mine are certainly not critical. Only impressions of a neophyte ...!!! Sorry for my bad English too (google translator ...)
I am an avid learner of this technique I discovered recently. I tried your software v1.4 beta (when the final?).
Can I list in my opinion, things that I found very good, and some less than modest suggestions:
good:
- The management of keyframes is remarkable and allows an infinite number of interventions
- The possibility of creating virtual movements without the aid of a dolly
- In general. I have not found anything as comprehensive and integrated with LR for metadata management in line with changes on them.
not good (to me ...!!):
- Like all applications in Java, uses an inordinate amount of memory! In situations with more than 1000 shots and you need a hardware performance significantly, especially if you want to keep open Lightroom. The deflickering is sometimes so heavy that the application sends a system with virtually hung 4Gb/1033Mhz ram and a quad core 2.5 Mhz and I have to force quit (kill), without knowing if the tool is working or if you just planted!
- On my imac (the features described above) I found that works almost exclusively on a single processor, perhaps the application is not written to parallelize batch jobs? If so, it would be a great advantage to work in multi-threaded processors.
- You can not always get good results from deflickering (perhaps it is not clear to me from the tutorials ...)
suggestions:
- Introduction of a function to sample the images to a given sequence of recovery. For example, if I took 1 picture every 5 seconds, but I want to use one of my same sequence every 20/30 etc. .. I am without having to select the shots one by one to skip a certain number.
- A progress bar of the business even when you process the deflickering and maybe a warning about the use of thresholds. It is not clear when the effect occurs more or less.
- I have not found a clear description of the use of linear functions (fade in / out / etc. .., about when should one or the other and the results they produce.
Sorry if I'm allowed, but mine are certainly not critical. Only impressions of a neophyte ...!!! Sorry for my bad English too (google translator ...)