Posts: 3
Threads: 2
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 3
Threads: 2
Joined: Sep 2020
Hello,
my workflow often requires After Effects instead of the LRTimelapse Video-Render.
When I use the new default to export JPEGs as Rec.2020, AE doesn't seem to interpret this format correctly. The picture appears very low saturated.
Now I use the checkbox to export in Rec.709.
- Do I really need Rec.2020?
- Is it possible with AE?
I tried to open the Rec.2020 JPGs with Photoshop, which seems to read it correctly. However I don't see any difference to the Rec.709 JPEGs on my calibrated Eizo CG319X no matter how hard I look.
- Which display is necessary to see a difference?
- Is an 8bit JPEG even capably of storing a bigger colorspace?
I'm asking because I think this may be a little bit similar to Log profiles in the HDR world. You compress/map a big dynamic range into a low dynamic format, preserve shadows and highlights but lose number of different values in midtoned gradients (color banding). However I may be wrong here.
Regards
Robert
my workflow often requires After Effects instead of the LRTimelapse Video-Render.
When I use the new default to export JPEGs as Rec.2020, AE doesn't seem to interpret this format correctly. The picture appears very low saturated.
Now I use the checkbox to export in Rec.709.
- Do I really need Rec.2020?
- Is it possible with AE?
I tried to open the Rec.2020 JPGs with Photoshop, which seems to read it correctly. However I don't see any difference to the Rec.709 JPEGs on my calibrated Eizo CG319X no matter how hard I look.
- Which display is necessary to see a difference?
- Is an 8bit JPEG even capably of storing a bigger colorspace?
I'm asking because I think this may be a little bit similar to Log profiles in the HDR world. You compress/map a big dynamic range into a low dynamic format, preserve shadows and highlights but lose number of different values in midtoned gradients (color banding). However I may be wrong here.
Regards
Robert