Posts: 2
Threads: 1
Joined: Jul 2019
Hi folks,
Sorry for what may not be an entirely appropriate and/or already-answered question (searched, but only found references to GB DeFlicker...) on these forums, but here we go...
As the subject line says, what are the differences between these two?
I've followed both these products for years, and used to shoot quite a lot of timelapse 7 or 8 years ago, but haven't done a lot since then.
Both products feature computer connectivity, de-flickering (although GB offers a separate app for this? Even though the regular Time Lapse app seems to offer it...?), etc.
GB used ND filters for holy grail, whereas LR uses hands-on changing of exposure settings...(although I suppose the same techniques could be used for both?)
AFAIK LR might have better implementation of key framing (everything, it seems).
I have access to the full Adobe suite, as well as FCPX, so I'm not lacking in software options.
Any insight would be appreciated!
Sorry for what may not be an entirely appropriate and/or already-answered question (searched, but only found references to GB DeFlicker...) on these forums, but here we go...
As the subject line says, what are the differences between these two?
I've followed both these products for years, and used to shoot quite a lot of timelapse 7 or 8 years ago, but haven't done a lot since then.
Both products feature computer connectivity, de-flickering (although GB offers a separate app for this? Even though the regular Time Lapse app seems to offer it...?), etc.
GB used ND filters for holy grail, whereas LR uses hands-on changing of exposure settings...(although I suppose the same techniques could be used for both?)
AFAIK LR might have better implementation of key framing (everything, it seems).
I have access to the full Adobe suite, as well as FCPX, so I'm not lacking in software options.
Any insight would be appreciated!