• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

TIMELAPSE + - compared to the new LRT PRO TIMER 2

Offline
#1 fotologbuch
I am interested in the TIMELAPSE + View (http://www.timelapseplus.com). Can someone say or share something with the part? Are there problems with LRTimelapse or is everything still working fine? Question to Gunter specifically: What do you think about him compared to the new LRT PRO TIMER 2. Is one better suited and why? Thanks in advance.

Greetings Frank
Offline
#2 Gunther
The view works fine with LRTimelapse. There is also a faq covering this: https://forum.lrtimelapse.com/Thread-usi...rtimelapse

LRT Pro Timer is just an intervalometer. For Exposure/ISO/Aperture Ramping you would need to use qDslrDashboard.
The View is both: intervalometer and ramper - a nice all in once concept, that also implements my algorithm for Day-To-Night ramping. On the downside, the view is much slower then qDDB: from my experience you'd need dark times of at least 6 Seconds for image transfer and analysis.
Subscribe to: LRTimelapse Newsletter, Youtube Channel, Instagram, Facebook.
Offline
#3 fotologbuch
Hello Gunter.

Thank you for the fast answer. Unfortunately, I can not use qDDB at the moment anyway (because iPhone and not available in Appstore). So I'll probably take Timelapse + View first. He should also work well with the PINE Motion Controller. I hope I'm not doing anything wrong. Regardless of this, you have always highlighted the quasi Zero Delay on the LRT PRO TIMER. Is the timelapse + view just as good here?

Greetings Frank.
Offline
#4 Gunther
You can contact Zoltan, maybe he can help you to get qDDB on your iOS device. Contact him via dslrdashboard.info
Subscribe to: LRTimelapse Newsletter, Youtube Channel, Instagram, Facebook.
Offline
#5 fotologbuch
Thanks and have done.

...also check out: