Posts: 4
Threads: 2
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4
Threads: 2
Joined: Mar 2014
Hey LRT friends -
I had a question about a AdobeCC/LRTimelapse workflow. What I'm envisioning here is, capturing RAW files with a Canon DSLR and trying to eliminate as many renders as possible before the final product is published. I think it might be possible to only have one Render, but I was wondering if anyone has tried this out. I've outlined each step and a note weather I think any image degradation is taking place. Not sure if that's even the right term for the loss in quality for rendering, but that's the word I'm using for the sake of this post. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Import RAW images from card using either LRTimelapse or Lightroom5 or BridgeCC - no degradation
In LRT: Initialize sequence, create xmp files - no degradation
In Either Bridge or Lightroom5 make your edits, save the edits to meta data - no degradation
Re-analyze in LRT - Ramp sequence, deflicker, etc. save changes to xmp - no degradation
Now if the project is done here - render out video (degradation) and upload to web-based publication either Vimeo or Tube (another degradation)
This is where it gets interesting. What if your sequence is part of a larger edit that contains normal 1080p video clips and you are editing in Premiere. Can you use dynamic link to save a render? If so it would proceed something like this:
Export sequence to Premiere CC via Adobe's Dynamic Link (no degradation that I'm aware of)
Export Premiere CC sequence directly to vimeo/youtube. First Degradation I'm not sure if there are two degradation steps here or just one. I can imagine there's two: PremiereCC writes the file to a temporary directory on your hard drive (#1) then uploads it (Youtube or Vimeo doing the down-grading=#2)
Would be awesome if anyone has any input. Please excuse the lengthy post
Dave Katz
tenacityinpursuit.com
I had a question about a AdobeCC/LRTimelapse workflow. What I'm envisioning here is, capturing RAW files with a Canon DSLR and trying to eliminate as many renders as possible before the final product is published. I think it might be possible to only have one Render, but I was wondering if anyone has tried this out. I've outlined each step and a note weather I think any image degradation is taking place. Not sure if that's even the right term for the loss in quality for rendering, but that's the word I'm using for the sake of this post. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Import RAW images from card using either LRTimelapse or Lightroom5 or BridgeCC - no degradation
In LRT: Initialize sequence, create xmp files - no degradation
In Either Bridge or Lightroom5 make your edits, save the edits to meta data - no degradation
Re-analyze in LRT - Ramp sequence, deflicker, etc. save changes to xmp - no degradation
Now if the project is done here - render out video (degradation) and upload to web-based publication either Vimeo or Tube (another degradation)
This is where it gets interesting. What if your sequence is part of a larger edit that contains normal 1080p video clips and you are editing in Premiere. Can you use dynamic link to save a render? If so it would proceed something like this:
Export sequence to Premiere CC via Adobe's Dynamic Link (no degradation that I'm aware of)
Export Premiere CC sequence directly to vimeo/youtube. First Degradation I'm not sure if there are two degradation steps here or just one. I can imagine there's two: PremiereCC writes the file to a temporary directory on your hard drive (#1) then uploads it (Youtube or Vimeo doing the down-grading=#2)
Would be awesome if anyone has any input. Please excuse the lengthy post
Dave Katz
tenacityinpursuit.com