Posts: 5
Threads: 1
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 5
Threads: 1
Joined: Dec 2017
Thanks in advance ...
[Image: https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/2017123...507752.jpg]
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Posts: 5
Threads: 1
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 5
Threads: 1
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 13,915
Threads: 187
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5
Threads: 1
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 5
Threads: 1
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 5
Threads: 1
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 5
Threads: 1
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 13,915
Threads: 187
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5
Threads: 1
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 5
Threads: 1
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 13,915
Threads: 187
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 5
Threads: 1
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 5
Threads: 1
Joined: Dec 2017
(2018-01-02, 12:11)gwegner Wrote: Could you please try rendering in MP4 instead of ProRes. Vimeo will convert to MP4 anyway - it seems as if Vimeo cannot deal well with the ProRes files.
I'd recommend "Force 16:9", "Quality: High", don't go higher than 4K UHD. This is more than enough for Vimeo.
One thing you might try as well is use "Standard Gamut" instead of "Wide Gamut". Let me know!
One more thing: LRTimelapse produces high quality masterfiles that are normally not particularily streamlined for direct "end-use", like uploading on a video portal or playing back on a tv. Normally you would feed those master files into a vdeo editor, add music, add other clips, make a film and then rerender with a bitrate and codec suited for the video portals and upload the result to a video-platform like vimeo. The video platforms cannot deal well with very high bitrate files and that's okay - you don't really need them for the end-output. But you need them for the intermediary step in the video editor to have the maximum quality for further processing.
BTW: I will keep exploring the vimeo compatibility issue.
Posts: 13,915
Threads: 187
Joined: Feb 2011