Wifi or USB OTG - Printable Version +- LRTimelapse Forum (https://forum.lrtimelapse.com) +-- Forum: Time Lapse Shooting (https://forum.lrtimelapse.com/Forum-time-lapse-shooting) +--- Forum: LRTimelapse and qDslrDashboard Auto-Holy-Grail Ramping (https://forum.lrtimelapse.com/Forum-lrtimelapse-and-qdslrdashboard-auto-holy-grail-ramping) +--- Thread: Wifi or USB OTG (/Thread-wifi-or-usb-otg) |
Wifi or USB OTG - hernandito - 2014-09-08 Hi Guys, New to all of this and very excited. I am getting a used Nexus 7 2012 32GB tonight. I use a Nikon D5200 and I do have the Nikon WiFi adapter (can't recall the number W1b...?) which works fine. I already bought a USB OTG cable, and I wanted to get feedback about the speed of transfer between qDD and the camera when using the LRTL module. I assume it would be better/reliable to use the cable, over the Nikon Wifi adapter. Can anyone who has experience offer me some advice on this? I worry about loosing the WiFi connection and starting over... I tried it with an OLD Nook Color w/ Cyanogenmod and the Wifi-qDD experience was awful... thus why I am buying the Nexus. Also, I am aware of the rule of thumb of setting the interval to 4 secs. between exposures, I would love to drop that down to 1 or 2 secs. Would the cable be able to handle the image transfer faster to make this possible? I live in NYC and inevitably there will be people in my shots... shooting at 4 secs. is too long and people just jump through the frame. Many thanks, H. RE: Wifi or USB OTG - Gunther - 2014-09-09 It would be best if you try it out with your own setups. There is no general rule that USB will be faster the Wifi. I don't have any stability issues with wifi as well - but please make your own tests with your specific gear. RE: Wifi or USB OTG - hernandito - 2014-09-09 Thank you Gunther... I will do some testing today as you suggest. Your work is amazing! Thanks again, Hernando |